
The recurrent theme which states that Chilean Education is getting through a crisis has nowadays become such a commonplace topic that it cannot be denied or ignored so frivolously. As a matter of fact, a too well-known truth like this is not quite easy to be overlooked by any citizen who is not so foolishly absent-minded as not to happen to look at the newspaper headlines or watch at least once in a while the nine o`clock news on tv. However, one thing is to take something seriously and another one understand it thoroughly. The point at issue is to research what is actually happening in Chilean schools, which is the basic element which is not working properly well at that level because the so-called “crisis” seems to turn up from the very bottom of the educational system as the “penguin revolution” exposed dramatically to the public consideration: in the very classroom.
From my personal point of view, the educational problem is of structural nature, that is, its origin rises from the technical way in which the post-industrial society tends to organize and rearrange its different parts or structures and how they function within the extremely defined limits of the capitalist pattern. Obviously, being the educational system so important a “substructure” within the cultural superstructure of Chilean society, whose main role is reproduce the socially accepted norm and knowledge, it must be necessarily affected by the inevitable contradictions of its economic base. In other words, the teaching-learning process is not simply a neutral or objective phenomenon taking place in a classroom, aseptic lessons in schools isolated from the “real world”outside. Above all, the contractual relationship between students and teachers is also suffering all the time from the “capitalist schizophrenia” brought about by the dichotomy between the economic need of producing cheap and qualified labour force and the individual pursue of human development. Values such as freedom and justice are taught to “pure”students by most “democratic” teachers as noble aspirations which can never be given up despite the barriers which society puts up in order to weaken, discourage or even abolish them. “Why should I study and be a good student if when I leave school the society will despise me anyway?”. It is actually very hard to be honest enough as a teacher and give a correct answer at the same time, especially to a young boy brought up in a ghetto like La Legua or La Victoria, isn`t it?
With respect to the role of future teachers in the crisis, I think that there is no practical way out for us not be unjustly blamed for it. Historically, teachers have always served as scapegoats for the mistakes and faults committed by political authorities and businessmen hidden behind them. Nevertheless, the teaching profession should always feel obliged mainly with students and their families even when the government and school managers tried mischievously to break this commitment. I hope I will get through despite all the difficulties to come in the near future.
From my personal point of view, the educational problem is of structural nature, that is, its origin rises from the technical way in which the post-industrial society tends to organize and rearrange its different parts or structures and how they function within the extremely defined limits of the capitalist pattern. Obviously, being the educational system so important a “substructure” within the cultural superstructure of Chilean society, whose main role is reproduce the socially accepted norm and knowledge, it must be necessarily affected by the inevitable contradictions of its economic base. In other words, the teaching-learning process is not simply a neutral or objective phenomenon taking place in a classroom, aseptic lessons in schools isolated from the “real world”outside. Above all, the contractual relationship between students and teachers is also suffering all the time from the “capitalist schizophrenia” brought about by the dichotomy between the economic need of producing cheap and qualified labour force and the individual pursue of human development. Values such as freedom and justice are taught to “pure”students by most “democratic” teachers as noble aspirations which can never be given up despite the barriers which society puts up in order to weaken, discourage or even abolish them. “Why should I study and be a good student if when I leave school the society will despise me anyway?”. It is actually very hard to be honest enough as a teacher and give a correct answer at the same time, especially to a young boy brought up in a ghetto like La Legua or La Victoria, isn`t it?
With respect to the role of future teachers in the crisis, I think that there is no practical way out for us not be unjustly blamed for it. Historically, teachers have always served as scapegoats for the mistakes and faults committed by political authorities and businessmen hidden behind them. Nevertheless, the teaching profession should always feel obliged mainly with students and their families even when the government and school managers tried mischievously to break this commitment. I hope I will get through despite all the difficulties to come in the near future.